Sig P320 vs M17: Which One Should I Choose?

Firearm Reviews & Recommendations
1

I’ve been diving into the details of two popular firearms: the Sig Sauer P320 and the M17. Both are known for their reliability and performance, but I’m trying to wrap my head around their differences and what might suit my needs better. Here’s what I’m considering:

Overview

  • Sig P320: A modular striker-fired pistol that’s versatile and customizable.
  • M17: The military version of the P320, designed to meet rigorous standards.

Key Aspects to Compare

  1. Safety Features:

    • How do their safety features compare? I’ve heard the M17 has additional safety mechanisms, but I want to know if the P320 also holds up in this area.

  2. Design and Ergonomics:

    • They both seem to have a fan base when it comes to comfort and grip. How does the overall ergonomics play into your shooting experience?

  3. Capacity:

    • The standard magazine capacity is something I’ve looked into, but does the difference in capacity impact your experience during practice or competitive settings?

  4. Shooting Scenarios:

    • I’m curious about your thoughts on which firearm might be better suited for home defense versus competition shooting.

Personal Experiences

If you’ve owned or shot both models, I’d love to hear your insights on:

  • Reliability in different conditions.
  • Performance at the range.
  • Any particular features that stand out, good or bad.

Conclusion

Ultimately, I’m trying to gather a well-rounded view to help with my decision. Any opinions or experiences would be greatly appreciated! Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!

2

I’ve been torn between the Sig P320 and the M17 for a while! The P320 is known for its modularity, which can be a huge plus. But the M17 has that military pedigree. Tough choice! Can’t wait to hear everyone’s thoughts.

4 Likes
3

That’s true! The ability to swap out frames and triggers on the P320 is fantastic for customization. Plus, the P320 has a 3.9-inch barrel compared to the M17’s 4.7-inch, which some might prefer for concealment.

3 Likes
4

I’m more a fan of the M17! It’s built for reliability in tough conditions. The enhanced safety features and the provision for optic mounting are great. Wouldn’t trade that for anything!

6 Likes
5

Interesting point! Do you think the shorter barrel really affects accuracy? I feel like it’s all about personal preference and grip.

6

Absolutely! It’s about comfort. I also appreciate how the trigger mechanism on the P320 is smooth and consistent. Anyone else notice that?

7

Totally! But the M17’s trigger is also praised for its quality. I think it’s slightly more rigid, but some shooters prefer that for precision.

8

Does anyone have experience shooting both? I’ve always wanted to do a side-by-side to really see the differences firsthand. My local range rents both.

9

That’s the best way to go! The feel in your hand can make a huge difference in your choice. It’s personal. Can’t wait to see your feedback if you do!

10

Man, I just love the aesthetics of the M17! It looks so cool with that flat dark earth finish. Anyone else attracted to that design?

11

Right? But looks aren’t everything! The P320 has a more polished finish that feels great too. What’s more important to you, looks or specs?

12

Specs all the way! If it can’t perform, I don’t care how it looks. But hey, a good design doesn’t hurt! So tough balancing those priorities.

13

Exactly! And let’s not forget the weight difference. The M17 is a bit heavier, which helps with recoil management, but some may prefer the lighter P320.

14

You’re right, the weight can definitely influence shooting comfort, especially during long sessions at the range. The modularity of the P320 just adds to its versatility overall.

2 Likes
15

Exactly! But imagine having both! One for casual outings, the other for serious business. Is that too greedy?

16

Not greedy at all! Just practical. In this case, having options is essential for adapting to different scenarios, right? What’s the worst that could happen?

17

Haha! Well, maybe a slight depletion of funds! But in all seriousness, does anyone know if there are any major issues with either model overall?

18

I’ve owned both the Sig P320 and the M17. For me, the P320 has a better grip comfort. It feels more natural in the hand during extended shooting sessions.

19

I can relate! I tried the M17, but the grip is a bit bulkier for my smaller hands. The customization options for the P320 also help a lot.

6 Likes
20

I prefer the M17’s weight distribution. It feels more balanced when taking quick shots. There’s something about the stability that just adds to my confidence.