Why Did the FBI Move Away from the 10mm? Let's Discuss!

As someone who has fired both, I find the 10mm fun at the range but can imagine having to use it in a high-pressure situation might be a different story.

Absolutely, and that’s where the 9mm shines! Less fun at the range maybe, but it’s built for precision in critical situations.

5 Likes

Reflecting on this discussion, it’s fascinating how law enforcement evolves alongside advancements in ammunition technology. Preferences shift for good reason, often prioritizing agent safety and effectiveness.

The FBI shifted away from the 10mm primarily due to its recoil and the training required to manage it effectively. The .40 S&W was developed as a compromise, offering better control for follow-up shots.

Absolutely! The increased training for agents was a significant factor, as it impacted their effectiveness during high-stress situations.

In addition to recoil, the advancements in ammunition technology also played a crucial role. The 9mm, with the right modern hollow points, can be just as effective as larger calibers but with less recoil.

That’s an excellent point! The development of more effective 9mm rounds really changed the game for law enforcement.

6 Likes

I find it fascinating how tactics have evolved. The FBI recognized that high capacity magazines and faster reloads offered more advantages in dynamic situations, which the 9mm and .40 S&W delivered better than the 10mm.

Definitely! It’s not just about stopping power but also about being able to engage multiple targets effectively.

Let’s not forget the psychological impact on agents too. Many appreciated moving to calibers with less recoil, as it increased their confidence during critical incidents.

Good point! It’s amazing how comfort and confidence can directly influence performance in the field.

Was the move away from 10mm purely about operational needs, or do you think there was some political influence involved too? The FBI has always been under scrutiny to adapt for public perception.

That’s an interesting angle. There may have been external pressures, but I believe the changes were primarily data-driven and tactical. The evidence from their experiences heavily shaped these decisions.

And a little humor here: it’s kind of like moving from a muscle car to a fuel-efficient sedan—better for everyday use!

Haha! True! But like all sedans, that 9mm can still pack a punch when needed.

Overall, it really shows how agencies must adapt to meet operational demands. It’s a reflection of the changing landscape of law enforcement.