Thoughts on 300 Blackout Barnes TAC-TX for Hog Hunting?

Hunting with Firearms
1

Seeking Insights on Barnes TAC-TX in .300 Blackout

I’ve been doing a lot of reading about the Barnes TAC-TX ammo for the .300 Blackout, and I’m curious if anyone here has experience using this specific round, particularly for hog hunting or home defense.

Practical Performance

It seems like TAC-TX is praised for its terminal performance, especially with its solid copper construction. I’d love to hear some real-world feedback on:

  • Accuracy: How does it group for you at different ranges?
  • Expansion: Any results you’ve witnessed from real-life scenarios?
  • Penetration: How does it fare against larger game like hogs?

Load Development

I know that tweaking loads can significantly impact performance. For those who reload their .300 Blackout, what’s been your approach with the TAC-TX ammo? Any recommended powders, OAL, or tips on achieving consistent velocity and accuracy?

Comparisons with Other Bullets

For those who have tried different bullet types or weights in the .300 Blackout, how does the TAC-TX stack up? Are there certain situations or distances where you prefer it over others?

General Observations

What about your overall satisfaction with this ammo for personal defense? Any insights on its reliability when it really matters?

Looking forward to hearing your experiences and any data you can share. Thanks in advance for your help!

7 Likes
2

I’ve had great success using the Barnes TAC-TX for hog hunting with my 300 Blackout. The expansion and weight retention are impressive, making them very effective.

3

That’s awesome to hear! What distances are you shooting at?

4

Usually around 100 to 200 yards. The TAC-TX performs consistently well within that range. Definitely a great choice for those distances.

5

I prefer the TAC-TX too! I’ve found that they have a flatter trajectory compared to other rounds I’ve used, which is a big plus when hunting.

6

Have you used them alongside any other ammo brands that you can compare them to?

8 Likes
7

Yes, I tried the Hornady subs but found them less effective on heavier hogs. The Barnes just hits them harder.

8

That’s interesting! I’ve always heard good things about Hornady. But if TAC-TX gets the job done better, that’s what matters.

9

For me, reliability is key. I’ve experienced one misfire with Hornady, but none with Barnes. That’s why I’m sticking with TAC-TX.

10

That’s wild! Consistency really matters when you’re out in the field.

7 Likes
11

Absolutely! And I love how easy they are to reload. Makes them a versatile choice for my 300 Blackout setup.

12

Has anyone tried them in subsonic loads? I’m curious about the performance difference for quieter hunts.

13

I haven’t, but I’d love to know too! The idea of quieter hunting is appealing. Anyone have experience?

14

I tried them once and was pleasantly surprised at the accuracy. But, I wouldn’t say they compare to supers for power.

15

So it sounds like there’s a trade-off with sound versus power then?

8 Likes
16

I’ve been using the Barnes TAC-TX in 300 Blackout for hog hunting, and the terminal ballistics are impressive. The expansion is reliable, and I’ve noticed good penetration on medium-sized hogs.

17

That’s awesome info! I love how those rounds perform. Have you noticed any difference in effectiveness between subsonic and supersonic loads?

18

From my experience, the TAC-TX does well in ballistic gel testing, showing quick expansion. I believe it’s a solid choice for hunting.

8 Likes
19

Absolutely! The gel tests are pretty revealing. It seems like it would work great for self-defense too, right?

20

I’ve read that the Barnes bullets retain a lot of weight after impact, which contributes to better penetration. That’s why I like them for hog hunting!

7 Likes