I’m in a bit of a dilemma and need some help comparing the Glock 17L and Glock 34. Both handguns have their own merits, but I’m not quite sure which would suit my needs better, especially for competition shooting.
Here are a few considerations I have:
Barrel Length: The Glock 17L has a longer barrel than the Glock 34, which I’ve heard can help with accuracy.
Weight and Size: I’m wondering how much the extra length affects handling. Is the Glock 34 still easy to manage?
Upgrades and Accessories: Which model has a better selection of aftermarket parts? I’m considering some customizations for both.
Personal Defense: While I’m mostly interested in competitive use, I want to know if either model is better suited for personal defense situations.
Any thoughts or personal experiences with these models would be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance!
The Glock 17L has a longer barrel (6.02 inches) compared to the Glock 34’s (5.31 inches), which can offer improved accuracy. I’ve noticed that the longer barrel helps with sight alignment especially for precision shots.
That’s a great point! I’ve used both, and I find the Glock 34 feels slightly more balanced in hand. The trigger pull is also more consistent, which I think helps with precision.
Accuracy can vary based on the shooter’s grip and stance. Personally, I found the Glock 34’s grip to be slightly more comfortable for extended periods of shooting. It really comes down to personal preference.
I’ve had a more lively experience with the 34 overall! It seems to have a bit less recoil and improves follow-up shots during competitions. Anyone else feel the difference?
Absolutely, the recoil difference is noticeable! However, I’ve read that some prefer the extra length of the 17L for stability at longer ranges. It’s hard to choose!
Both guns are amazing! I lean towards the Glock 34 mainly for its longer sight radius which certainly helps with accuracy in competition scenarios. What are you mainly using it for?
Both models are built like tanks! I’ve had a 34 for years, and it’s been flawless. I believe both have excellent durability, but the 34 might be a better fit for competitive shooting.
It’s funny, but I’ve joked that the Glock 34 is just a fancy Glock 17 with a sportier feel! In all seriousness, the extra features might make it worth it for serious enthusiasts, though.
I think the primary difference lies in the barrel length. The Glock 17L has a longer barrel, which could be beneficial for precision in competitive shooting. It’s worth considering what you plan to use it for!
That’s a great point! I’ve also read that the Glock 34 is designed more for competition and has a lighter trigger weight, making it easier to shoot fast. Perfect for IPSC or IDPA.
Totally agree with you, victoriabarnett. I’ve tried both models, and the Glock 34 felt more manageable during rapid fire sessions. It has a great grip!
Honestly, both are enjoyable to shoot! However, I’ve read that some find the longer sight radius of the Glock 17L to be more advantageous for accuracy, especially when trying out recreational shooting at longer distances.
I think the Glock 17L could be a bit unwieldy for home defense scenarios, especially in close quarters. The Glock 34 might be a better choice given its overall handling. You want quick reactions there!