Beretta 390 vs 391: Which One Should I Choose?

Firearm Reviews & Recommendations
1

Introduction

I’m looking to get some feedback on the Beretta 390 and 391 shotguns. I’ve heard a lot about both models, but I’m trying to figure out which one might be a better fit for my shooting style and needs.

Key Differences

  • Gas Systems: I’ve read that the gas system on the 391 is more refined and tends to cycle more smoothly. Can anyone confirm how it compares to the 390’s simpler design?
  • Weight: The 390 seems to be slightly heavier. Does this affect performance significantly when it comes to long days in the field?
  • Cleaning Processes: How much easier or harder is it to clean one over the other? I want something that won’t take hours to maintain after a day of shooting.
  • Magazine Cut-Off Mechanisms: I’ve seen that the 391 has a magazine cut-off system. Is this a big advantage when it comes to hunting?

Performance Reviews

What are your real-world experiences with these shotguns? How do they compare in terms of reliability, recoil management, and overall user satisfaction? I’m particularly interested in hearing about any long-term ownership stories.

Conclusion

I’m hoping to get some insights from fellow enthusiasts who have used both models. Your input will help me make a more informed decision before I potentially invest in one of these shotguns. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!

2

I’ve had extensive experience with both the Beretta 390 and 391. The 391 has a slight edge in accuracy thanks to its improved gas system. However, the 390 is a great choice if you’re looking for reliability in adverse conditions.

3

That’s a solid point! But how much of a difference does it make in real-world shooting situations?

4

I find the recoil management of the 391 to be superior. The stock design absorbs a lot of the kick, making it more comfortable for longer shooting sessions.

6 Likes
5

I can agree with that! Has anyone tried both models in heavier loads? I’m curious how they handle more powerful loads.

4 Likes
6

The 390 proves itself in rough conditions. I’ve used it during rainy days, and it has never jammed on me. Reliability is a big plus.

7

That’s great to hear! I think it really comes down to what conditions you’ll be shooting in most often.

4 Likes
8

For accuracy at the range, I’d lean towards the 391, but the 390 is just so dependable for casual outings. Which one fits your needs better?

9

Exactly! Sometimes you just want to shoot without worrying about the gear malfunctioning.

10

I’ve heard folks claim the 391 is overpriced for the marginal gains. What do you all think about the price-to-performance ratio?

11

I get that sentiment, but sometimes you pay extra for refinement and features. Are those worth it to you?

12

Haha, I feel like buying either model will make me a better shot, even if that’s not true! They both seem pretty solid!

3 Likes
13

I never thought of it that way! Investing in good gear does boost confidence, even if it doesn’t magically improve skills. What a curious phenomenon!

14

It’s all about the mental aspect too, isn’t it? Whatever helps you focus and perform better is worth considering.

15

I’ve owned both shotguns and I can say the Beretta 391 has a smoother action. The 390 is a bit lighter, though, which some people may prefer for all-day use.

16

That’s a great point! Weight difference can really affect how tiring a shotgun is to carry during a long day of shooting.

7 Likes
17

For me, the 391’s adjustable stock is a game changer. It really helps to get that perfect fit for shooting without stress on the shoulders.

8 Likes
18

I agree with robertsjonathan. However, the choke options on the 390 are quite extensive. That might be a deciding factor for many users.

19

Weight and barrel length are crucial. The 390 is slimmer, which might appeal to those transitioning from smaller, lighter firearms.

20

Don’t forget about how the 391 handles recoil! It feels much more controlled, making it great for longer sessions at the range.