338 Lapua vs 7mm Rem Mag: Which One Should I Choose?

Introduction

I’m considering getting into long-range shooting and big game hunting, and I’m torn between the 338 Lapua Magnum and the 7mm Remington Magnum. Both cartridges seem to have their pros and cons, and I’m looking for some insights from fellow shooters about their experiences.

Performance Comparison

I’ve done a bit of research, and here’s what I’ve gathered so far about their ballistics:

  • 338 Lapua Magnum
    • Known for its high energy and ability to maintain velocity at long ranges.
    • Great for extreme long-range precision shooting and larger game.
  • 7mm Rem Mag
    • Offers excellent accuracy and lighter recoil.
    • More versatile for different game sizes and hunting situations.

Cost Considerations

Another point to consider is the cost:

  • 338 Lapua Magnum ammunition tends to be more expensive and harder to find.
  • 7mm Rem Mag ammunition is generally more affordable and widely available.

I would love to hear from anyone who’s used either caliber. How do you feel about the cost-effectiveness versus performance trade-off? Is the extra power of the .338 worth the increased expense?

Suitability for Hunting

For those who hunt with these calibers, could you share your thoughts?

  • How did each caliber perform under different hunting scenarios?
  • Any recommendations on which would be better for deer hunting versus larger game like elk or moose?

Conclusion

I’m eager to learn from your experiences and insights. Any advice would really be appreciated as I try to make the best choice for my needs. Thanks for reading, and I look forward to your responses!

I’ve been debating between the .338 Lapua and the 7mm Rem Mag for long-range shooting. The .338 has a clearer edge in terms of knockdown power and effective range, but how does it fare with bullet drop at extreme distances?

I hear you, pleon! The .338 Lapua really shines for extreme long-range work due to its flatter trajectory. However, the 7mm Rem Mag is lighter and more manageable, especially if you’re hiking out to your spots.

5 Likes

The ballistic coefficient of the .338 Lapua is impressive, leading to less wind drift. But if you’re just starting out, the 7mm Rem Mag might be easier to handle and still offers decent performance.

Isn’t it funny how everyone loves to debate calibers? Both cartridges have their merits, and it often comes down to personal preference. But the .338 feels like the heavyweight champ when you need serious stopping power!

Exactly, margaretguzman! Preferences aside, you can’t deny that the .338 Lapua is built for distance. It holds up better in wind and maintains energy over longer ranges. Too bad it also means you’ll be lugging some extra weight!

While the .338 stands out in terms of range and stopping power, don’t underestimate the 7mm Rem Mag’s versatility. It’s great for a variety of game and conditions without feeling like you’re handling a cannon!

8 Likes

What about the recoil differences? I want something that can still be enjoyable to shoot for long sessions at the range. Can the 7mm Rem Mag deliver a less punishing experience?

Absolutely! The 7mm is much easier on the shoulder, so you can practice longer without feeling like you just got out of a boxing match! That said, if you’re looking for fun and serious performance, give the .338 Lapua a try too, just in small doses!

With increasing ammo costs, how do we weigh the cost vs. performance? The .338 Lapua is superior but can also drain your wallet quickly, especially for practice rounds.

8 Likes

That’s a valid point! If you’re on a budget, the 7mm Rem Mag offers affordability without sacrificing too much performance for most situations. Plus, ammo is more readily available! Win-win!

4 Likes

This topic seems ancient, yet so relevant! I like the stopping power of the .338 for big game but find myself leaning towards the 7mm for recreational shooting. Is there a middle ground?

Finding a middle ground is tough! You might consider something like the .300 Win Mag, which combines features of both and can be a good compromise. That way, you still get decent performance without the extreme penalties of the .338.

Great suggestion, tharper! The .300 Win Mag does have a good balance between recoil and performance. The choice ultimately depends on your intended use – big game, long range, or just fun at the range!

At the end of the day, it’s about how you plan to use it. If you’re going for extreme long-range precision shooting, the .338 might be your best bet. But for versatility, you can’t beat the 7mm Rem Mag!

4 Likes

So true! It really comes down to your specific needs and shooting style. I guess the best advice is to just try both and see which you feel more at home with!

I’m facing the same dilemma! I’ve read that the 338 Lapua is great for long-range, but the 7mm Rem Mag has a more manageable recoil. Any suggestions on rifles for both calibers?

You’re right! For the 338, consider the Accuracy International AXMC. It’s robust and built for precision. The 7mm Rem Mag pairs well with the Browning X-Bolt for lightweight hunting.

What about optics? I’ve heard good things about Nightforce scopes for both setups. Anyone have experience with those?

Nightforce is definitely solid! I also recommend Vortex for the 7mm Rem Mag; they offer great value for the price!