300 BLK vs 7.62x39: Which One Should I Choose for Hunting?

Hunting with Firearms
1

Introduction

As an avid hunter and firearms enthusiast, I’ve been trying to settle an ongoing debate in my head: the .300 Blackout or the 7.62x39? Both seem like great options for various hunting scenarios, but I’m looking for a deeper understanding of their differences and what might work best for me.

General Overview

Both cartridges have their own unique characteristics and intended uses, making them popular among shooters for different reasons.

  • .300 Blackout: Often praised for its versatility, especially when suppressed. It can switch effectively between subsonic and supersonic loads.
  • 7.62x39: Known for its reliability and performance in the AK platform, this cartridge has been around for a while and has a solid reputation.

Key Comparisons

To help everyone better understand which one is right for specific applications, I’d like to break down a few essential aspects:

  1. Reliability

    • .300 Blackout: Generally reliable in AR-15 platforms, but its performance can vary with subsonic loads.
    • 7.62x39: It’s often regarded as a workhorse, especially when used with reliable AK-style rifles.

  2. Cost

    • .300 Blackout: Tends to be pricier, especially for good quality rounds and components if you’re reloading.
    • 7.62x39: Usually cheaper to buy in bulk, which is nice for budget-conscious shooters.

  3. Versatility

    • .300 Blackout: Its ability to perform well both suppressed and unsuppressed makes it a top choice for hunters who might want to use it in different scenarios.
    • 7.62x39: While great in its own right, it doesn’t easily adapt to different kinds of loads quite like the .300 BLK.

  4. Ballistic Performance

    • .300 Blackout: The supersonic versions offer excellent ballistics and energy at close ranges, perfect for deer hunting in many states.
    • 7.62x39: Known for delivering good stopping power but can lose energy over longer ranges.

  5. Reloading

    • .300 Blackout: Reloaders often appreciate the versatility and potential for customizing their loads.
    • 7.62x39: Available components are plentiful, but the reloading specifics can be more complex due to larger projectile options.

Conclusion

In conclusion, I’m torn between the two options for my next hunting trip. I want something reliable and versatile, yet also budget-friendly. Both cartridges have their merits, and the choice comes down to specific needs. I’d love to hear thoughts from fellow hunters and shooters about what you find most advantageous, especially regarding personal experiences or any specific scenarios where one might outshine the other. Thanks in advance for the help!

2

.300 Blackout has a higher muzzle velocity, making it a good choice for hunting where you want a flatter trajectory. But 7.62x39 packs a solid punch at range, especially for larger game!

3

That makes sense! But how does the energy transfer compare? I heard 7.62x39 performs well in that area.

4

In terms of energy, .300 Blackout has the advantage for shorter ranges, but 7.62x39 holds its own with more energy delivered downrange, which is important for bigger animals.

1 Like
5

True, but I find that .300 Blackout’s versatility with subsonic loads makes it very appealing for tactical use too.

7 Likes
6

That’s a great point, john51! Subsonic .300 BLK rounds are excellent for hunting in noise-sensitive areas but can you still get effective range with them?

7

Yes, you can, qjohnson! Even with subsonic, you can effectively use it within 100-200 yards. Beyond that, 7.62x39 shines again because of the retained energy.

5 Likes
8

How about the ammo availability for both? I find that 7.62x39 tends to be more plentiful and often cheaper too, which is a plus for tactical situations.

2 Likes
9

Absolutely, but remember that .300 Blackout’s adaptability could save on costs in the long run if you’re shooting both supersonic and subsonic.

10

If you’re leaning towards precision hunting, .300 Blackout’s better accuracy at range can be a game changer. But for knockdown power, 7.62x39 might be the winner.

11

I’d say .300 Blackout is more versatile for different hunting conditions. The varied loads allow you to customize based on what you’re after.

2 Likes
12

Customization is great, but I wonder if that makes .300 BLK harder to find good loads for, especially in a pinch?

13

That’s an excellent question, cathynelson! You might have fewer choices for .300 Blackout in certain areas, which could limit you during hunting season.

14

.300 Blackout’s performance with heavier bullets can indeed be impressive. I had great success using it for deer hunting last season!

15

That’s encouraging! I’d love to hear more about what load you used.

6 Likes
16

I used 120 grain expanding rounds. They performed beautifully! But, hey, if we’re talking about fun at the range, 7.62x39 definitely has a larger bang for the buck! Pun intended!

17

I’ve been considering the .300 Blackout for hunting because it’s pretty versatile and can be used in AR platforms. Ammunition is also becoming more available, though prices fluctuate. Just something to think about!

18

I’ve heard that 7.62x39 tends to be cheaper than .300 Blackout. It might be worth checking local prices to see if there’s a significant difference in your area.

19

Both options have their pros and cons. The .300 Blackout offers better subsonic options, making it great for suppressed shooting. Meanwhile, the 7.62x39 is known for its excellent penetration with steel core ammo.

20

Has anyone else noticed how scarce .300 Blackout ammo can get at times? I mean, one week it’s everywhere, and the next it seems sold out! It’s frustrating as a regular shooter.